Editorial guidelines

The rules every page on this site is held to, including the ones that cost us money.

Sourcing

Every factual claim carries a source, and that source is primary wherever a primary source exists. We cite the trial, not the article about the trial. We cite the government fact sheet, not the blog that summarized it. Where evidence is mixed or weak, we say it is mixed or weak, including when a stronger claim would sell more.

Medical boundaries

Nobody on this site is a licensed clinician, and we never imply otherwise. We do not diagnose, we do not recommend stopping or changing prescription medication, and we do not describe a supplement as treating, curing, reversing or preventing any condition. Where a symptom warrants a doctor rather than a supplement, we say that instead of selling around it.

Commercial independence

We earn affiliate commissions on some products. We do not accept payment for a positive review, we do not let a manufacturer see a review before it publishes, and we do not remove criticism at a company's request. A commission rate has never determined a score, and a product we earn nothing on can outrank a product we do.

The practical proof of this is in the reviews themselves. If a formula cannot deliver the dose its own marketing leans on, that appears in the review, in the pros and cons, and in the score, regardless of what it costs us.

Experience claims

We never write a personal experience that did not happen. Where a review is a document analysis rather than a personal trial, the review says so explicitly, in its own section, near the top. There are no invented testimonials on this site, no borrowed before-and-after photographs, and no results attributed to people who do not exist.

Corrections

Errors are corrected in the article, with the date noted, not silently deleted. Write to contact@prostateclarity.com with the page, the sentence and the contradicting source.

Updates

Prices, offers and formulations change. Pages carry a last-updated date, and we re-verify pricing and label claims when we revisit a review. A date on a page means the page was actually reviewed on that date, not that a script touched the file.